Franco's review centered around himself He could relate to the "making of the movie" because he is an actor. Also, he didn't have personal relations or reasoning dealing with the actual movie. Franco's review didn't offer any argumentation and I didn't consider his review an actual review.

Lane gave a brief summary of the movie in his review. He also introduced the characters, giving a little explanation about each. Lane also makes an argument when he says, the only things that had order were Camp Ivanhoe and the breakfast routine (dealing with the movie). Even though Lane doesn't go into detail with his reasoning, I consider his review to be an actual review.